Dr. Yusdinur Usman and Ardhiana Fitriyanie, M.Si.
ABSTRACT
This study explores the crucial role of digital literacy in transforming the position of youth from passive users to active guardians in efforts to break the chain of trafficking in persons in the digital era. Using a qualitative, descriptive approach, this study analyzes how the shift in traditional criminal modus operandi to cyberspace—such as online grooming and fake job advertisements—has increased the younger generation’s vulnerability. The findings reveal several significant challenges, including low initial awareness of trafficking in persons, the normalization of the risks of informal labor migration due to economic pressures, and the lack of safe and youth-friendly reporting mechanisms. This article proposes strategies to strengthen the digital ecosystem using the Social Ecological Model, including interventions at the micro, ecosystem, and macrosystem levels. The transformation of the role of young people is carried out through three main stages: becoming critical users, active bystanders, and community guardians who function as an early detection network.
Keywords: Digital Literacy, Youth, Trafficking in Persons, Digital Ecosystem, Social Ecological Model.
INTRODUCTION
Today’s world is in the grip of digital technology, which offers unlimited opportunities for human mobility. However, behind the promise of progress lies a rapidly growing dark side: trafficking in persons. This crime no longer only occurs in dark alleys or remote places; it has migrated to the digital space, hiding behind device screens and social media algorithms. According to global data (UNODC, 2022), trafficking in persons remains one of the fastest-growing criminal industries in the world, tragically exploiting thousands of vulnerable individuals each year for financial gain.
At the epicenter of this vulnerability lies the younger generation. As digital natives, young people spend most of their time interacting in cyberspace. However, a paradox arises: their familiarity with technology does not automatically translate into acute awareness of danger. In fact, their excessive trust in digital connections often makes them easy targets for trafficking in persons syndicates, which now use far more sophisticated and manipulative recruitment methods.
In the past, trafficking in persons was often associated with kidnapping or physical coercion. Now, the pattern has shifted to digital information-based exploitation. Criminal syndicates use tactics such as “predatory grooming” on social media, fake job advertisements on professional platforms, and fictitious scholarship offers. They manipulate young people’s aspirations, economic vulnerabilities, and desires to achieve a better life quickly and instantly.
The main problem is no longer a lack of information, but rather an excess of information in the digital space, also known as information pollution. Amidst a flood of data, misleading information is deliberately designed to look very convincing. Without the ability to distinguish between real opportunities and criminal traps, young people often unknowingly step into the chain of modern slavery. In this context, digital literacy emerges not merely as an academic skill but as a crucial instrument of survival. Digital literacy goes beyond the technical ability to use search engines; it includes the cognitive capacity to critically evaluate the validity, purpose, and integrity of information.
There are at least three main pillars of digital literacy that help prevent human trafficking. First, healthy skepticism towards sources. The ability to cross-reference employment agencies or individuals who are newly known online. Second, understanding algorithms and privacy, and being aware of how malicious actors can harvest personal data to map potential victims’ psychological vulnerabilities. Third, ethical digital awareness. Understanding the consequences of every digital interaction and how the spread of misinformation can harm others.
Facing these challenges requires a paradigm shift. We must no longer view young people as passive “users” or mere victims whom the authorities must protect. Instead, through strengthening digital literacy, we strive to transform them into “guardians.” A young person with high digital literacy is not only able to protect themselves, but also act as an agent to break the chain in their community. When information literacy becomes a collective competency, the space for human traffickers to operate will become increasingly narrow. Information that was once used as a weapon to ensnare people is now turning into a tool for liberation and protection.
Several studies also emphasize the importance of digital literacy for young people in preventing trafficking in persons in Southeast Asia, and first, increasing awareness of online risks by recognizing the digital environment as a recruitment space (Twis et al., 2025), where digital literacy must include an understanding of online grooming, image-based exploitation, and emotional manipulation tactics. Second, deconstructing the romanticized narrative of exploitation by strengthening critical education on power relations and the myth of “consensual relationships” can prevent the normalization of exploitation (Merodio et al., 2020). Third, integration with early detection systems, such as the screening and risk prediction models offered by Anderson et al. (2025) and Prakash et al. (2024), can be strengthened through the involvement of schools and digital-based communities.
Thus, digital literacy is not merely a technical skill in using technology, but a critical capacity to recognize manipulation, understand power dynamics, and access help safely. In Southeast Asia, where a large young population and high internet penetration are common, this strategy has significant preventive potential.
This article will explore in depth how strategies to strengthen digital literacy can effectively reduce the number of victims of trafficking in persons among young people. By analyzing young people’s perspectives, the discussion will focus on developing practical strategies for stakeholders to empower the younger generation as the front line in the fight against modern slavery.
METHODOLOGY
This study uses a qualitative design to gain an in-depth understanding of how digital literacy contributes to transforming young people from mere users into guardians in the prevention of trafficking in persons. A qualitative approach was chosen because this study seeks to explore the meanings, experiences, and perceptions of young people regarding the risks of trafficking in persons in the digital space, including how they interpret information, recognize potential manipulation, and respond to these threats in their daily lives. The research focuses on the dynamics of digital awareness, self-protection strategies, and the potential of young people as agents of prevention in their digital and social communities.
Data collection techniques included in-depth interviews and document analysis. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 young people who actively use social media, educators, and practitioners working in the field of digital literacy and trafficking-in-persons prevention to obtain a comprehensive perspective on their experiences and knowledge regarding the risks of digital exploitation. The in-depth interviews were conducted in January 2026. Documentary studies were conducted by examining international organization reports, government policies, scientific articles, and digital campaign materials related to digital literacy and the prevention of trafficking in persons.
Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis techniques. The analysis process began with data reduction, which involved organizing and filtering data relevant to the research focus. This was followed by coding to identify patterns of meaning that emerged from the interviews and discussions. From this process, main categories and themes emerged, including digital risk awareness, information verification skills, and the role of youth in building a collective awareness system in the digital space. The final stage of the analysis was carried out through an interpretive process to explain the relationship between digital literacy and the transformation of youth’s role in breaking the chain of Trafficking in persons.
To ensure the validity and credibility of the data, this study used several verification techniques, namely source triangulation, method triangulation, and member checking. Source triangulation was conducted by comparing information from various informants, including youth, educators, and practitioners. Triangulation was carried out by combining interviews and documentation results to reinforce the research findings. In addition, member checking was conducted by reconfirming the data interpretation results with several informants to ensure that the research findings accurately reflected their experiences and views. Through this process, it is hoped that the research results will have a high level of validity and provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of digital literacy in preventing trafficking in persons among youth.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The issue of trafficking in persons (TIP) continues to be a multidimensional challenge in various regions of the world, including in ASEAN countries. The complexity of this phenomenon lies not only in the individual factors of the victims but also in social, economic, and environmental dynamics, as well as digital transformations that expand the scope of exploitation. Recent literature indicates that effective prevention approaches must be multidimensional and grounded in the social ecosystem (Twis et al., 2025; Schwarz et al., 2018). In this context, strengthening youth digital literacy has become an increasingly relevant preventive strategy.
Twis et al. (2025) propose the use of the Social Ecological Model (SEM) to understand the correlation between vulnerability and demand in adolescent sexual exploitation. This model places individuals in layered interactions between micro factors (personal characteristics and close relationships), exosystems (community environment), and macrosystems (social values, policies, and cultural norms). Their findings confirm that vulnerability stems not only from experiences of violence or poverty at the individual level but also from the built environment, social disorganization, and the digital ecosystem that opens up opportunities for exploitation.
In Southeast Asia, where internet penetration and social media use among young people are high, the digital ecosystem factor becomes increasingly significant. The digital environment can function as a space for recruitment, manipulation, and exploitation, especially through pseudo-relationship tactics such as online grooming. Merodio et al. (2020) criticize popular narratives such as the term “Romeo pimps,” which tend to romanticize perpetrators and obscure the coercive nature of exploitation. Deconstructing this discourse is important in digital literacy education so that young people can recognize manipulative patterns disguised as affective relationships.
The literature also highlights the importance of screening instruments and predictive models to identify high-risk adolescents. Anderson et al. (2025) validated the Trafficking in Persons Screening Tool for adolescents involved in the justice system, showing that early identification can improve trauma-informed interventions. Meanwhile, Prakash et al. (2024) developed a predictive model for child sex trafficking risk among adolescent girls in the child welfare system, considering factors such as history of violence, residential instability, and prior exploitation.
Although these studies focus on the United States context, their implications are relevant to Southeast Asia, particularly in the development of school- and community-based early warning systems. Peck et al. (2024) emphasize that school health personnel are in a strategic position to recognize signs of exploitation, including behavioral changes, extreme absenteeism, or indications of sexual violence. This means that youth digital literacy needs to be integrated with educators’ and social service professionals’ detection capacity.
Vollinger and Campbell (2020) identify that adolescent victims often have to navigate fragmented service systems, putting them at risk of not receiving comprehensive support. The study emphasizes the importance of inter-agency coordination, integrated referral centers, and community-based prevention services. From an SEM perspective, strengthening digital literacy cannot stand alone as an individual intervention but must be supported by responsive service structures.
Schwarz et al. (2018) introduced the concept of the trafficking continuum, which views exploitation as a spectrum of vulnerability and control, rather than a single event. This perspective broadens the understanding that prevention must begin before exploitation occurs, including through critical education on power relations, the digital economy, and digital space security.
Michael et al. (2025) discuss the securitization of Trafficking in persons in Malaysia, showing that framing the issue as a national security threat can strengthen legal responses, but also has the potential to shift the focus from victim protection to migration control. In Southeast Asia, security-based approaches are often dominant. However, the literature shows that empowerment-based preventive strategies—including critical digital literacy—are more sustainable than repressive approaches alone.
Ram-Goldin (2022), in their systematic review, found that primary service providers often lack training on identifying victims of Trafficking in persons. This knowledge gap underscores the need for digital literacy integration not only for youth but also for professionals who interact with them.
Keo et al.’s (2014) study on Trafficking in persons and moral panic in Cambodia provides a critical perspective on the global construction of the issue of Trafficking in persons. The study shows that alarmist claims about the scale and involvement of organized crime in Trafficking in persons are often not supported by strong empirical data. In Cambodia, most of the perpetrators who are imprisoned are poor women with limited education and economic opportunities, operating in small networks that are not complexly organized (Keo et al., 2014). These findings correct the dominant narrative that associates Trafficking in persons with large criminal syndicates and billions of dollars in profits.
The concept of moral panic (Cohen, 1973, as cited in Keo et al., 2014) is relevant in reading the dynamics of anti-trafficking policies in Southeast Asia. International pressure, particularly through aid regimes and global rankings, encourages countries to adopt repressive regulations without adequate contextual understanding. This could lead to policies that emphasize control and criminalization rather than empowerment-based prevention.
In the context of strengthening youth digital literacy, these findings highlight the importance of an evidence-based approach and critical literacy in public narratives about trafficking. Digital literacy should not only target technical skills, but also analytical abilities to understand how the media, global policies, and moral campaigns frame the issue of exploitation.
O’Brien et al. (2017), through an analysis of data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, found that adolescents in the child welfare system who experienced domestic minor sex trafficking (DMST) were more likely to exhibit runaway behavior, externalizing behavior, and substance abuse problems in the clinical category. This correlation reinforces that child sex trafficking is not an isolated event, but part of a series of psychosocial vulnerabilities.
These findings are consistent with the social-ecological model (Twis et al., 2025), which identifies individual factors (trauma, externalizing behavior), relational factors (family dysfunction), and systemic factors (involvement in child welfare) as risk determinants. In the context of Southeast Asia, similar phenomena can emerge in the form of street children, undocumented migration, and adolescents exposed to the informal digital economy.
Tepelus (2008) highlights the relationship between Trafficking in persons, child sex tourism, and corporate social responsibility. The study shows that initiatives such as The Code of Conduct for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism are examples of multi-stakeholder partnership-based social innovation. However, these good practices have not been fully transformed into sustainable public policies.
Wooditch (2011) evaluates the effectiveness of the Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report published by the U.S. Department of State. The results show that tier classification does not consistently improve the anti-trafficking efforts of ranked countries, nor does it always correlate with systematic funding allocations.
This finding is important in understanding the dynamics of anti-trafficking policies in Southeast Asia, where countries often seek to improve their international rankings through legislative approaches or symbolic law enforcement. If prevention is too focused on formal compliance with global standards, community-based interventions—including youth digital literacy—may be neglected.
Thus, strengthening digital literacy needs to be positioned as a long-term preventive strategy that transcends the logic of international rankings. Rights-based digital literacy can be a more sustainable alternative approach than merely responding to external pressures.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Youth Digital Literacy Challenges in Preventing Trafficking in Persons
Strengthening the role of youth in preventing trafficking in persons through improving digital literacy faces many challenges. Increasing the role of youth is crucial as the modus operandi of exploitation shifts into increasingly sophisticated, cross-border digital spaces. As the group most actively interacting with technology, youth are strategically positioned to be at the forefront of detecting and breaking the chain of trafficking in persons, which is often hidden behind fake job offers or scholarship opportunities on social media. Through comprehensive digital literacy training, young people are not only equipped with the technical skills to verify information but also with the critical awareness to understand cybersecurity risks and self-protection mechanisms. However, this article finds several challenges faced by young people in preventing trafficking in persons.
First, there is a low initial awareness of trafficking among young people. Low initial awareness of trafficking in persons among young people is often rooted in digital literacy that is not yet oriented towards cybersecurity aspects and the normalization of instant job offers on social media. This phenomenon is exacerbated by the information gap regarding modern recruitment methods, which have shifted from conventional practices to technology-based exploitation, where promises of high salaries abroad are often treated as opportunities for success without adequate verification of their legality. As a result, youth vulnerability increases not because of a general lack of access to information, but because of a lack of critical understanding in distinguishing legitimate career opportunities from organized exploitation traps in the digital space.
Second, the normalization of the risks of informal labor migration, especially in areas with high economic pressure. The normalization of risks in informal labor migration in areas of high economic pressure often emerges as a psychological and social defense mechanism, in which the danger of exploitation is considered a reasonable “cost of living” for the family’s economic survival. In regions with limited employment opportunities, the success stories of a handful of migrants who have managed to send remittances often obscure the reality of the risk of violence or fraud, creating a social norm that illegal migration is a commonplace act of courage rather than a vulnerability. This pressing structural pressure forces individuals to ignore safety protocols and legal procedures in favor of quick access to income, ultimately perpetuating the cycle of high-risk migration, which is considered the only realistic way out of systemic poverty.
Third, there is a lack of youth-friendly reporting mechanisms for cases of trafficking in persons. The lack of youth-friendly reporting mechanisms in cases of trafficking in persons is often caused by rigid bureaucratic procedures and the lack of integration of digital platforms that are intuitive for the younger generation. Fear of social stigma, intimidation from perpetrators, and legal processes that are considered intimidating make many young victims or witnesses reluctant to speak up. In addition, existing complaint channels often do not provide strong guarantees of anonymity or adequate initial psychological support, creating a gap between protection service providers and the reality of youth vulnerability in the digital space. Without a user-friendly and confidential technology-based reporting system, early detection of exploitation cases will continue to lag behind the rapidly evolving modus operandi of perpetrators.
Fourth, security risks for whistleblowers, especially in cases involving criminal networks trafficking in persons. Security risks for whistleblowers in cases of criminal Trafficking in persons networks are often systemic and extreme, given the cross-border reach and vast financial resources of perpetrators’ organizational structures. These threats are not only in the form of direct physical intimidation but also include cyber attacks, doxing, and threats against the whistleblower’s family members in an attempt to silence testimony and halt legal proceedings. In many regions, weak anonymity guarantees and limited comprehensive witness protection programs create deep fear, as whistleblowers often face networks with strong local influence and corrupt officials. As a result, without mechanisms that are impervious to data leaks and rapid evacuation systems, the potential for retaliation from criminal syndicates remains a major obstacle to fully exposing human exploitation practices.
Strategy for Transforming the Role of Youth, From Information Consumers to Protection Agents
Amidst the challenging digital landscape for youth, efforts are being made to transform the role and position of youth from mere users of information and social media platforms to agents of protection. This strategy emphasizes a paradigm shift in the role of youth in three main stages:
First, the shift from passive users to critical users. This strategy emphasizes strengthening critical literacy among youth about the dangers of trafficking in persons. Critical literacy is provided to youth so they can identify false information about overseas job vacancies, recognize patterns of online grooming and digital manipulation, and understand the risks of exploitation in illegal labor migration. With these skills, youth become not only consumers of information but also users who can verify and assess risks.
Second, changing the role of young people from critical users to active bystanders. Changing this role means strengthening young people’s participation and concern for their surroundings, especially their immediate environment, including their family, circle of friends, school, campus, and so on. By encouraging young people to become active bystanders, they are expected to warn friends who are at risk, disseminate information on the prevention of trafficking in persons, and discuss trafficking methods in their communities with their closest networks. The concept of bystander intervention has been widely used in the prevention of gender-based violence and is now being adapted for the prevention of trafficking.
Third, changing the role of young people from active bystanders to community guardians. The final stage of transformation is to make young people community guardians, which means strengthening their role as individuals who can actively monitor potential exploitation related to trafficking in persons in social and digital environments, connect victims of trafficking in persons with support services, and report indications of trafficking in persons to relevant agencies, especially to the authorities around them, such as the village government, the nearest police station, and/or civil society organizations working on Trafficking in persons issues. In this position, youth function as a community-based early detection network. Therefore, youth need to be equipped with Early Warning Early Response (EWER) knowledge about trafficking in persons issues in their communities.
Strategy for Strengthening the Youth Digital Ecosystem for the Prevention of Trafficking in Persons
Faced with the complexity of challenges by youth in cyberspace, strengthening a safe and inclusive digital ecosystem is an absolute prerequisite in efforts to prevent trafficking in persons. This requires not only improving individual skills but also systemic integration of protective technological infrastructure, responsive regulations for new modes of operation, and solid cross-sectoral collaboration. By building a resilient digital ecosystem, we not only narrow the space for criminal networks to carry out illegal recruitment but also create an environment that supports youth in independently verifying information and accessing secure reporting mechanisms.
The first strengthening strategy is to leverage the digital ecosystem to reduce risks and strengthen trafficking-in-persons prevention. The transformation of the digital space has changed the face of Trafficking in persons, where technology now serves as the main infrastructure for perpetrators to carry out massive recruitment and manipulation. The practice of online grooming, which involves building false relationships of trust through social media, has become a very effective predatory tactic because it can penetrate physical boundaries and family supervision. In this exploitative ecosystem, young people’s digital identities are often mapped through scattered personal data, which is then used by syndicates to devise highly personalized and convincing scams, ranging from fictitious career offers to emotional manipulation.
Faced with these threats, digital literacy must be redefined not merely as the technical skill of operating devices, but as a crucial and profound preventive strategy. This literacy includes the ability to think critically in validating information, awareness of personal data security, and understanding of algorithm patterns that may direct users to harmful content. By instilling digital literacy as a paradigm of self-protection, young people are no longer passive targets but active actors with “immunity” against manipulative narratives spread by criminal networks in cyberspace.
Ultimately, strengthening a secure digital ecosystem requires synergy between individual awareness and systemic infrastructure resilience. Strengthening trafficking in persons prevention means building a digital environment with early-detection systems for suspicious content, encrypted reporting procedures, and regulations to address cross-border crime. When youth digital literacy is combined with a protective ecosystem, the space for exploitation will narrow, transforming the internet from a field of risk into a means of empowerment that supports safe migration and the development of potential without the shadow of Trafficking in persons.
In addition, using a social ecological model(SEM), such as that of Twis et al. (2025), to build “guardians” is a highly relevant approach to preventing trafficking in persons among youth. To transform youth into “guardians,” digital literacy must be understood through the lens of the social ecological model, which places individuals in layered interactions at the microecosystem, ecosystem, and macroecosystem levels.
At the micro level, the main focus is to equip youth with emotional and cognitive intelligence to detect personal threats in the digital space. This ability includes a deep understanding of the characteristics of risky relationships, such as online grooming tactics that manipulate the psychological vulnerability of victims through false attention or instant promises. By strengthening literacy at the individual level, young people not only learn to protect their personal data but also identify anomalies in digital communication that lead to exploitation, so they have a strong internal “filter” before the interaction moves into the dangerous physical realm.
At the ecosystem level, challenges arise from digital communities that are often disorganized and lack oversight, creating loopholes for predators to operate undetected. Online communities that lack strict content moderation or clear security standards tend to become incubators for the spread of false information and illegal job offers. Building awareness at this level means encouraging young people to actively create healthy community norms, strengthen peer-to-peer support systems, and ensure that the digital platforms they use have reporting mechanisms that respond to indicators of Trafficking in persons.
The macrosystem level encompasses young people’s understanding of how social values, consumerist culture, and national policy frameworks affect their security in cyberspace. Economic pressures internalized as instant-success ambitions often cause young people to ignore security risks in favor of seemingly lucrative opportunities on the internet. Therefore, strengthening at this level involves education on digital rights, advocacy for stronger personal data protection policies, and understanding cross-border laws governing cybercrime. Without a protective macrosystem and strict law enforcement against international syndicates, efforts at the individual and community levels will always face insurmountable structural barriers.
Another aspect that cannot be ignored is strengthening critical digital literacy to help young people deconstruct manipulative narratives. Being a “guardian” means being able to see beyond the surface. The literature emphasizes the importance of critical digital literacy. In this context, young people must be able to detect manipulative patterns that are often disguised as affective relationships, such as the myth of “Romeo pimps” that romanticizes perpetrators. In addition, young people must also have the capacity to analyze digital information, including the analytical skills to understand how the media and moral campaigns frame the issue of exploitation. This includes being critical of moral panicnarratives that are often not supported by strong empirical data.
To that end, young people need to be strengthened in understanding symbolic responses to rights-based approaches. Analysis shows that repressive security approaches often dominate in ASEAN, but are unsustainable. Therefore, there needs to be a transformation from a security/control approach to youth empowerment. A more effective strategy is empowerment through digital literacy rather than simply controlling migration or symbolic law enforcement for the sake of international rankings (such as the TIP Report). Therefore, strengthening youth capacity in rights-based literacy is highly relevant for all parties, namely through the development of rights-based digital literacy as a long-term alternative that transcends external pressures and the logic of global rankings.
CONCLUSION
Trafficking in persons has transformed from a conventional physical threat into a digital-based crime that exploits social media algorithms and information technology. Young people, as digital natives, are at the epicenter of this vulnerability because their familiarity with technology does not always correlate with their ability to detect cyber threats. Criminal syndicates now use manipulative tactics such as online grooming, fake job advertisements, and fictitious scholarship offers to ensnare victims through digital spaces.
The main challenges in prevention include low initial awareness of modern modus operandi and the normalization of the risks of informal labor migration due to high economic pressure. In addition, existing reporting mechanisms remain youth-unfriendly due to rigid procedures, a lack of anonymity, and real security risks for reporters when dealing with criminal networks. These factors create structural barriers that make effective early detection difficult.
In facing these threats, digital literacy must be redefined as a survival tool that includes the cognitive capacity to evaluate the integrity of information critically. This strategy involves three main pillars: healthy skepticism towards information sources, a deep understanding of algorithms and data privacy, and ethical digital awareness. Through strengthening this literacy, young people are encouraged to transform from being mere passive “victims” to “guardians” who can break the chain of Trafficking in persons in their communities.
The transformation of the youth’s role unfolds through three stages: becoming critical users, becoming active bystanders, and, finally, becoming community guardians. As community guardians, young people serve as an early detection network, connecting victims with support services and reporting indicators of crime to the relevant authorities. This approach ensures that prevention is not based solely on self-protection but also on collective concern for the surrounding environment.
As a long-term measure, it is necessary to strengthen the digital ecosystem by integrating individual skills with robust technological infrastructure and responsive regulations. The use of the Social Ecological Model (SEM) helps map interventions from the micro to the macro levels to ensure comprehensive protection. By prioritizing rights-based digital literacy over a repressive security approach, it is hoped that a safe and empowering digital environment will be created for the younger generation.
REFERENCES
Anderson, V. R., McKenna, N. C., & Pierce, K. (2025). Validating the Human Trafficking Screening Tool for Justice System-Involved Youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251368857.
International Labour Organization, & Walk Free. (2022). Global estimates of modern slavery: Forced labour and forced marriage. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_854733/lang–en/index.htm
Keo, C., Bouhours, T., Broadhurst, R., & Bouhours, B. (2014). Human Trafficking and Moral Panic in Cambodia. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214521361.
Lemke, M., Bascug, E., & Howard, A. (2022). Seen Yet Unseen: A Case of Human Trafficking at Harris High School. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 25(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554589211055105.
Merodio, G., Duque, E., & Peña Axt, J. C. (2020). They Are Not Romeo Pimps, They Are Traffickers: Overcoming the Socially Dominant Discourse to Prevent the Sex Trafficking of Youth. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(8-9), 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420938881.
Michael, S. D., Sidhu, J. S., & Dosch, J. (2025). The securitisation of human trafficking in Malaysia. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251393347.
O’Brien, J. E., White, K., & Rizo, C. F. (2017). Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Among Child Welfare-Involved Youth: An Exploratory Study of Correlates. Child Maltreatment, 22(3), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559517709995.
Peck, J. L., Rigby, K. B., Hettenhaus, K. P., & King, K. Y. (2024). Child Trafficking: What School Nurses Need to Know. NASN School Nurse, 39(4), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X241243141.
Prakash, J., Goel, R., Mu, Y., Rosner, B., & Stoklosa, H. (2024). Risk Prediction Model for Child Sex Trafficking Among Female Child Welfare-Involved Youth: Welfare-Involved Female Sexual Exploitation Risk Assessment Tool. Journal of Women’s Health, 33(12), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0415.
Ram, S., & Goldin, D. (2022). Primary Care Clinician’s Knowledge of Trafficking in Persons: A Systematic Review. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 33(3), 388–397.
Schwarz, C., Alvord, D., Daley, D., Ramaswamy, M., Rauscher, E., & Britton, H. (2019). The Trafficking Continuum: Service Providers’ Perspectives on Vulnerability, Exploitation, and Trafficking. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 34(1), 116–132.
Tepelus, C. M. (2008). Social responsibility and innovation on trafficking and child sex tourism: Morphing of practice into sustainable tourism policies? Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(2), 98–115.
Twis, M., Cimino, A. N., Plunk, M., Mendenhall, A., & Mancus, G. (2025). Correlates of Youth Sex Trafficking in the United States: The Role of the Environment in Shaping Vulnerability and Demand. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1–14.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2022). Global report on trafficking in persons 2022. United Nations Publications. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/glotip.html
Vollinger, L., & Campbell, R. (2022). Youth Service Provision and Coordination among Members of a Regional Human Trafficking Task Force. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7-8), NP5669–NP5692.
Wooditch, A. (2011). The Efficacy of the Trafficking in Persons Report: A Review of the Evidence. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(4), 471–493.
